Notice: The precarious but Profound Middle Ground in the Struggle Between Religion and Science.

This text talks about the ideology of the narrator and the others's ideas.

The narrator's ideology is about religion, is that he defends it, specially Christianity, against Atheists. Atheists says that a religious man cannot live in a modern society, and that they have to abandon their ideas and move to the civilization.

The narrator, answers that it's true that there are some Christians that hold their ideas from the past, and their view of the modern world is oblivious, and also to the progress of the science. Also, he says that the scientific socitety doesn't accept people that don't think always scientific.

But he thinks that there are people that are religious but also believe in science, only that they accept theological reasons, and get their science from the Bible.

He accepts that there are two highly polarized sides, and that there isn't a mid-term, or a middle ground. He's trying to get more Christian people to believe in evolution (to make a mid-term). Why the victory of one side prescribes defeat on the other, he questions.


ORIGINAL NOTICE:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/karl-giberson-phd/why-is-middle-ground-so-p_b_779161.html